You have reached a collection of archived material.

The content available is no longer being updated and may no longer be applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration. If you wish to see the latest content, please visit the current version of the site.

For persons with disabilities experiencing difficulties accessing content on, please use the DoD Section 508 Form. In this form, please indicate the nature of your accessibility issue/problem and your contact information so we can address your issue or question.

United States Department of Defense United States Department of Defense

DoD News

Bookmark and Share

 News Article

Mullen Endorses Working Group’s Report

By Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Nov. 30, 2010 – The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff today fully endorsed the report of the working group that assessed the impact of a possible repeal of the law that bans gay men and women from serving openly in the military.

Click photo for screen-resolution image
Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates and Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, conduct a press briefing at the Pentagon discussing the public release of the "Dont Ask, Dont Tell" Comprehensive Working Group report, Nov. 30, 2010. DOD photo by U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Chad J. McNeeley

(Click photo for screen-resolution image);high-resolution image available.

During a Pentagon news conference with Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Navy Adm. Mike Mullen praised the group’s co-chairs, Army Gen. Carter F. Ham, commander of U.S. Army Europe, and Jeh C. Johnson, Defense Department general counsel.

Ham and Johnson led an unprecedented research effort looking at the attitudes of servicemembers and their families and the best way forward should Congress repeal the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law.

“The working group surveyed our troops and their spouses, consulted proponents and opponents of repeal and examined military experience around the world,” Mullen said. “They also spoke with serving gays and lesbians.”

The chairman called the working group’s recommendations “solid, defensible conclusions.”

Mullen said he was gratified that the working group focused their findings and recommendations “rightly on those who would be most affected by a change in the law: our people.”

The chairman recommended repeal of the law during testimony before Congress in February, and he called for research into how best to do this. “For the first time, the [service] chiefs and I have more than just anecdotal evidence and hearsay to inform the advice we give our civilian leaders,” he said today.

Mullen said he and the Joint Chiefs will use the report to formulate the advice they give to Gates and President Barack Obama, and he commented on some of the working group’s conclusions.

“I think it's noteworthy that the working group found strong leadership to be the single most important factor in implementing any repeal,” he said. “That may sound fairly obvious, but it’s a key point.”

Repeal of the law is a complex social and cultural issue, Mullen said. “But at the end of the day, whatever the decision of our elected leaders may be, we in uniform have an obligation to follow orders,” he said. “When those orders involve significant change, such as this would, we need to find ways to lead the way forward. Our troops and their families expect that from us, and I think the American people do, too.”

Servicemembers expect leaders to maintain high standards of conduct and professionalism as the military moves forward, the chairman noted.

“We treat people with dignity and respect in the armed forces, or we don’t last long in the armed forces: No special cases, no special treatment,” Mullen said. “We’re going to continue to comport ourselves with honor and hold ourselves accountable across the board to impeccably high standards, repeal or no repeal.”

The chairman noted that while the report shows the overall risk may be low with respect to readiness, cohesion and retention if the law is repealed, the change still would pose challenges. He also reiterated the belief he and Gates share that if a change is to come, it should be by way of the legislative process.

“We can best address those challenges by having it within our power and our prerogative to manage the implementation process ourselves,” Mullen said. “Should repeal occur, I share the secretary’s desire that it come about through legislation -- through the same process with which the law was enacted, rather than precipitously through the courts.”


Contact Author

Navy Adm. Mike Mullen

Related Sites:
Special Report: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Report
Video: Gates, Mullen "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Report Briefing
Transcript: "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Report Briefing by Gates, Mullen
Video: Army Gen. Carter F. Ham, Jeh C. Johnson "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Report Briefing


Article is closed to new comments.

The opinions expressed in the following comments do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Defense.

11/30/2010 6:16:30 PM
This is just another example of political correctness run amonk. This change will probably come about by people who have never had to live in a tent or share a water container with another person,much less give them mouth to mouth trying to keep them alive. Go ahead , let every military person now have to worry about AIDS and the other diveant behavior of these so called gays in addition to having there ass shot off. Call them what they are HomeSexuals. Gay means being happy,and is not related to sex. I do not believe that the majority of Americam military personnel are in favor of this. Put it to a VOTE of active duty military, and I believe you will get a complete different result from the B S you are trying to palm off on the American people.
- Willis G. Noel Msgt USAf ret., grand ridge,il

11/30/2010 4:04:55 PM
To the opponents of repealing DADT: What are you going to do when a gay soldier, sailor or pilot, living or dead, earns the Medal of Honor for bravery above and beyond the call of duty? How is that going to make you feel? If he lives to receive the medal, will you salute him as is required by military protocol. Or will you mount an ugly campaign against him to have him stripped of the medal?
- Bob, Minnesota

Additional Links

Stay Connected